Ondaproductions

Lee, 53 Nev. Associated Developers Co. See also 5 Corbin, Corbin on Contracts ? 237 (1979). Martin, 117 Ariz. 1104 (1951); Restatement (Second) of Contracts ? 98 [...] However, in non-equitable conversion cases the courts have not been so willing to rescue defaulting purchasers and will require strict compliance with the “time is of the essence” provision. These cases do not recognize the doctrine of substantial performance with respect to the buyer’s obligation to pay the full buy price by the deadline for close of escrow. 567, 655 P.2d 521 (1982), R&S Investments v.
Vancouver Realtor

Information is deemed relaible but not guaranteed.

This entry was posted on Friday, July 31st, 2009 at 10:55 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.